Skip to main content

Ironizing Ugolino: D. Heinsen, Ironizing Ugolino

Ironizing Ugolino
D. Heinsen, Ironizing Ugolino
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Issue HomeBibliotheca Dantesca, Vol. 1
  • Journals
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
This text does not have a table of contents.

Ironizing Ugolino

David Heinsen, University of Texas at Austin

This article analyzes an adaptation of Canto 33 of the Inferno, a musical setting of Count Ugolino composed by Gaetano Donizetti (1828). The composition is first presented within the frame of its contemporaneous aesthetic, one that treats Ugolino as a pathos-inspired tale of human suffering. Donizetti’s composition, however, fails to align itself to this tragic reading due to structural contradictions that prevent the listener from sympathizing with the musical agent. To address this divergence, the article extends the most recent theories of musical narrative by Byron Almén and Michael Klein to propose an ironic reading of the work, essentially a subversion of the structural and ideological expectations of a nineteenth-century setting of the character. This strategy opens up an interpretative space for a richer understanding of the composition by placing extant Dantean criticism and musical analysis in dialogue—thereby, considering Ugolino through the lens of his insincerity and paternal failings.

Keywords: Dante, Inferno, Ugolino, Gaetano Donizetti, Musical Semiotics, Musical Narrative Theory, Hermeneutics

NB: This article is only available in PDF. To download the article’s PDF, click on the grey cube icon next to the article title.

Annotate

Articles
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org